WinInfo Daily News   |   Windows IT Pro
in

This Blog

Syndication

SuperSite Blog

What’s new in Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 SP2?

There’s been some confusion about what is included in Service Pack 2 (SP2) for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008. For example, I saw somewhere that Hyper-V is supposedly added to Windows Vista in this release. It is not.

Here’s what’s new:

Windows Vista

  • Inclusion of Windows Search 4.0 for improved indexing performance, broader indexing scenario inclusion, as well as new Group Policy integration for Windows Search
  • Integration of the Windows Vista Feature Pack for Wireless which contains Bluetooth v2.1 support, the most recent specification for Bluetooth wireless technology
  • Some graphics enhancement to reduce glitches when streaming high def content with specific hardware configurations
  • Setup & Deployment improvements to detect incompatible drivers blocking service pack installations
  • Provides a Service Pack Cleanup tool which helps restore the hard disk space by permanently deleting previous versions of files updated by SP2

Windows Server 2008

  • Inclusion of Microsoft’s Hyper-V technology for Server
  • Backwards compatibility with Terminal Services licensing keys
  • Better manageability features with DFS/FRS console, and Storage Resource Manager (i.e.: Quota Filter and File Screening Filter)
  • Improved error reporting in DFSR to help identify incorrectly configured deployments which lead to failed replication
  • Updated power policy driving significant Power Management improvements

Just to be clear, the final version of Hyper-V is added to Windows Server 2008 as part of SP2; the original shipping version of Server 08 (“SP1”) included a pre-release version of Hyper-V.

In short, don’t believe everything you read.

Comments

 

robertsjoe said:

Confusion about editions of Microsoft products?! No way! @mikegalos thinks it's the best way to do things. Clearly Microsoft and Mike are wrong, wrong, wrong.

December 2, 2008 8:32 PM
 

tayme said:

Another fine example of our local zit faced teenager in the basement on Daddy's iMac...what a tool you are, robertsjoe. just once, I'd like to see you back up a single claim that you make with factual data. Such a waste.

--tayme

December 2, 2008 9:44 PM
 

Waethorn said:

What would be involved in hacking Hyper-V so that it installs in Windows Vista?

December 2, 2008 11:49 PM
 

file server | Digg hot tags said:

Pingback from  file server | Digg hot tags

December 3, 2008 6:28 AM
 

Lindy said:

So now its safe to install a Windows Server os at SP2?  Why do they do this, it just confuses people.

Waethorn you can run Hyper V on Vista, its called VMware workstation 6.51 and it kicks *** all over Hyper V, 8 days a week.

December 3, 2008 6:59 AM
 

Waethorn said:

"Waethorn you can run Hyper V on Vista, its called VMware workstation 6.51 and it kicks *** all over Hyper V, 8 days a week."

Apples (not those Apples) to oranges.  VMware Workstation is a for-pay version of Virtual PC.  It's not a hypervisor solution, nor is it free.

December 3, 2008 7:25 AM
 

Waethorn said:

....my question still stands.

I'm guessing Microsoft will never do this officially anyway, since they recommend that the parent OS be dedicated to running the Hypervisor and nothing else.  I'm not sure exactly what the reasoning is for this.  I'm guessing it has something to do with having minimal overhead and offering the highest level of performance for load balancing between child partitions.

It also means the parent OS has access to all this nice hardware that the child partitions don't, and it's not even being used to its full extent.

I just don't see the full-performance load balancing thing being a big issue for virtualization on a desktop.  I mean, Virtual PC can only do enough as it is.

Virtual PC already supports VT hardware too though.

I kind of wonder, that if Microsoft implemented Hyper-V in a parent desktop OS (and supported sound, etc.), what would the performance difference be between it and Virtual PC running with VT hardware support....

Is there much difference?

What are the barriers in implementing "full" hardware virtualization too?  ie. full video card virtualization, DirectSound support, etc.

Isn't this breaking into the realm of what I was talking about in the other article about layers of complexity?  I mean, if you only had a hypervisor which virtualized all hardware, and then stripped direct hardware requirements out of legacy operating systems, you'd be left with something that looks like an OS shell which runs as an isolated environment for legacy apps.

Hmm....

December 3, 2008 2:18 PM
 

Links for December 3, 2008 « Steve Mullen’s Blog said:

Pingback from  Links for December 3, 2008 « Steve Mullen’s Blog

December 3, 2008 3:42 PM
Acceptable Use Policy

About pthurrott

Paul Thurrott is the guy behind the SuperSite for Windows. Way behind. :)
SPONSORED LINKS FEATURED LINKS

Collaborate with Confidence Accelerate deployment and simplify Microsoft SharePoint management with EMC solutions and services. Calculate your savings nowSee how SAN is 57% cheaper than DAS over three years Announcing Symantec Backup Exec 2010With integrated deduplication and unified archiving technology. Feb 25 - Are your IT Systems distributed? Or Convoluted?Find out why integrated management solutions are more important than ever in today's IT environments and what criteria to consider when evaluating those solutions. Virtualization Faceoff – Join the DiscussionBlogs, free poster, videos, community commentary – IT experts and peers face off on VMware & Microsoft virtualization solutions. Should Your Email Live in the Cloud?This Forrester report shows how-to calculate your on-premise email costs and compare with cloud-based alternatives and offers best practices for reducing email costs. Exchange Server 2010: Deploying Unified Communicationsregister for this free virtual event and build your Unified Communications future on a strong Exchange Server 2010 foundation New from Left-Brain.com - Manage VMware with PowerShellLearn how to perform everything from simple ad-hoc reporting at the command-line to complex scripts that automate a massive deployment of hundreds of virtual machines.  Solve your old problems using less code than you thought possible!
Windows IT Pro |  Subscribe |  Register |  FAQ for Windows |  Media Kit |  WinInfo News |  Europe Edition |  About Us |  Contact Us/Customer Service |  Affiliates/Licensing
SQL Server Magazine |  Office & SharePoint Pro |  WinDevPro |  asp.netPRO |  IT Library |  Technology Resource Directory |  ITTV |  IT Job Hound

© 2010 Penton Media, Inc.     Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing