Microsoft Will Not Extend XP Lifecycle Again: Here's What's Really Happening

Microsoft Will Not Extend XP Lifecycle Again: Here's What's ReallyHappening | keyongtech

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:21:04 GMT

Pingback from Microsoft Will Not Extend XP Lifecycle Again: Here's What's ReallyHappening | keyongtech

re: Microsoft Will Not Extend XP Lifecycle Again: Here's What's Really Happening

Reeker — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:02:27 GMT

"Vista on 1GB is faster than XP on 128MB.

try loading any antivirus software on XP with 128MB and you'll know what I mean. Vista with 1GB handles the extra load much better."This isn't True Vista requires minimum 512 ram and XP minimum 128 Ram.So If you Have Vista with1 Giga of course is faster than XP with 128 ram

D??lig IT-journalistik om Windows XP | Ohsohightech.se

D??lig IT-journalistik om Windows XP | Ohsohightech.se — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:16:03 GMT

Pingback from D??lig IT-journalistik om Windows XP | Ohsohightech.se

Windows XP and the non-looming June 30th date « The Waking Badger

Windows XP and the non-looming June 30th date « The Waking Badger — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:20:59 GMT

Pingback from Windows XP and the non-looming June 30th date « The Waking Badger

re: Microsoft Will Not Extend XP Lifecycle Again: Here's What's Really Happening

Breetai — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:15:14 GMT

I think Microsoft's history needs to be taken into account when it comes to how they think about customers (The public,) when it regards product activation. How many customers got ROYALLY SCREWED because the MSN Music servers are getting shut down? That's just a recent blatant example if you look at the history. Ugh... It's pretty obvious Microsoft's Customers are HP, Dell, ect, they could care less about consumers.

News ?? Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified

News ?? Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:50:20 GMT

Pingback from News ?? Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified

News ?? Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified

News ?? Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:04:14 GMT

Pingback from News ?? Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified

News » Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified

News » Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:18:05 GMT

Pingback from News » Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron ???

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron ??? — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:24:51 GMT

Pingback from Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron ???

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron ???

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron ??? — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 06:31:52 GMT

Pingback from Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron ???

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified | Technology Blog

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified | Technology Blog — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 06:31:48 GMT

Pingback from Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified | Technology Blog

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron …

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron … — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:31:38 GMT

Pingback from Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron …

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified | Technology Blog

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified | Technology Blog — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 02:57:30 GMT

Pingback from Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified | Technology Blog

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron Schenone, MVP

Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron Schenone, MVP — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:47:36 GMT

Pingback from Microsoft Windows XP Policies Clarified ~ The Blade by Ron Schenone, MVP

re: Microsoft Will Not Extend XP Lifecycle Again: Here's What's Really Happening

subzerohitman721 — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:48:47 GMT

@Waethorn

"I retired my Pentium 3 in 2006 because many of the newest games couldn't be played on it."

seriously?

i retired my Pentium 3 when Athlon XP's came out. that was like 7 systems ago for me.

Dude, Seriously. :)

That custom P3 system I had held fine during the early Pentium 4/Athlon time, since games and software didn't require much else. I regularly upgraded memory, hard drives, power supply, and video cards. If it ain't broke, why scrap it? Early P4's had heat problems and I could have bought a higher P3 processor to keep up. At 933 Mhz, I could have run Vista on it. Memory wise, the board topped out at 2 GB.

Infact, I was very proud of it when it held up during the Blaster/Sasser crisis. Infact, I played Warcraft 3 on it with absolutely no difficulties. I still built other systems in my spare time for friends, customers, and family. Its easy to go run and upgrade, but much harder to keep existing systems relavent. But I do think that after 6 years, its time to put it down.