<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.winsupersite.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx</link><description>I must somewhat sheepishly admit that I&amp;#39;d never heard of Sun&amp;#39;s VirtualBox virtualization solution, but a few people recommended it today on Twitter so I thought I&amp;#39;d give it a look. What I see looks promising. On Windows (client), there are</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76440</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:59:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76440</guid><dc:creator>mikegalos@msn.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oops, meant Microsoft Watch column.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76440" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76439</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:12:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76439</guid><dc:creator>mikegalos@msn.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OT: But posting to the oldest open thread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;quot;spin as negative as possible about Microsoft&amp;quot; Windows Watch column has done some preliminary memory testing on Chrome and confirms that its &amp;quot;one process per tab&amp;quot; model sucks down huge amounts of memory. IE8's memory optimized process model sucks down a lot but not next to the Google product.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76439" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76436</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:37:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76436</guid><dc:creator>subzerohitman721</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, I think my brother could get some great use out of this Virtualbox. That way he can separate his personal desktop from business. Since he's about to build a server to do his business stuff, he might as well try VirtualBox. Thanks Paul, I will definitely pass this on. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76436" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76426</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:35:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76426</guid><dc:creator>fria</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Virtualbox has been well know to Linux users for some time now. It's a way for them to run applications that aren't compatible in Linux. &amp;nbsp;The non free version has usb support and works very well. Also note that once the guest os is installed, there is an add-on download that allows you to run the guest in full screen and special mouse controls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76426" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76423</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:36:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76423</guid><dc:creator>kellymjones</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sun licensing and marketing have always been a bit of a mystery to me. On one hand they advertise &amp;quot;free free free!&amp;quot;, and on the other hand the licenses often restrict free use for an organization larger than 1 person. I have no problem with Sun wanting to make money, it's just that once you look at things a little more closely things aren't as free as they seem. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76411</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:24:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76411</guid><dc:creator>mikegalos@msn.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A little clarification. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenBox is only free in the Open Source Edition. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Closed Source Edition can only be used for personal use or for limited evaluation for free. Alternately you can buy a license for a price that you can discuss with your SUN sales rep. (No, they don't give a price on the web site)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that the Open Source Edition is missing some features (that SUN says primarily target enterprise customers) including USB support, SATA support, iSCSI support and RDP server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76411" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76410</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:10:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76410</guid><dc:creator>lsproc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;rlcronin, i think by AMD64 it is referring to AMDs implementation, which Intel later adopted (since Itanium never really took off for desktops).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76410" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76408</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:57:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76408</guid><dc:creator>mikegalos@msn.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It'll be interesting to see your thoughts on virtualization after the conference on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76408" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: VirtualBox</title><link>http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/05/virtualbox.aspx#76405</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:30:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a5a28da7-a54a-49cb-8e3d-fb9e7f7597ae:76405</guid><dc:creator>rlcronin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;No Intel 64-bit &amp;nbsp;version?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.winsupersite.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=76405" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>